Cameras - July 1st, 2010
Nikon D90 DX DSLR Review
Advertisement Links
Recommendation: Casual users who aren’t concerned about how tough the kit lens is should buy now. Semi-pros who want a good lens might want to wait and just get the body (available about a month after the kit release)
Before making the leap to the D90 I researched this and other cameras for several weeks. I actually wanted the more expensive D300 because of the magnesium body and weatherproofing, but ultimately decided that the $600 difference was too big for just that one issue.
The D90 has the same sensor (or greatly similar depending on the source) as the D300 which means it shares the same great ISO capabilities. 1600 looks fine and you can definitely get usable small prints from even 3200. There are some reviewers on other sites claiming that the D90 has better noise reduction than the D300. Combine that with the the new Nikon VR lenses and you can shoot in low light at ridiculously slow shutter speeds. I’ve always hated using a flash and this camera is going to allow me to avoid using it in situations I never dreamed were possible. I took a shot in a dimly lit room at night and this camera picked up details I couldn’t see with my own eyes!
The control layout is superb. The single button choices make complete sense – ISO, image quality, white balance and previous shot are right there on the left side of the LCD.
I did not buy this camera for its video function. However, Nikon did not deliver the goods here. You can buy a several year old Canon P&S S2 or S3 that shoots video (VHS/regular quality, not HD) at 30fps with stereo sound AND autofocus. If they could put that kind of functionality on a $200 camera it should be possible on a $1000 one as well. It just seems that if you’re going to add a function like this it should have been done well or not done at all. If you’re buying this camera because of its video capability then I would urge you to wait until Nikon or another DSLR maker does it right. Or just buy a separate HD video camera at a fraction of the cost of the D90.
I realize a lot of folks like the kit lens, but it is not the same quality as Nikon’s other zooms in this price range. I read that Nikon says this kit lens, the 18-105mm VR, would sell for $400. Thus the “$100 savings by buying the kit.” I bought the Nikon 70-300mm VR at the same time for about $485 and the build quality is far better with a metal mount and rubber gasket to keep out the elements. The kit lens has a plastic mount with no rubber gasket and it just feels cheap in comparison. If you’re just looking for a basic everyday lens as an average user this might not matter, but if you’re an aspiring amateur/semi-pro this is really not acceptable.